Francois Hollande's recent victory in France's election was seen as a significant event in world politics. Hollande's election has led political junkies to ask "what does this mean for the rest of the world?" Certainly this is a symbolic victory for socialists -- libertarian or
state socialists. But nothing but promises have been made by Hollande
and the socialists. Although material changes haven't happened,
Hollande's election may have threatened the global capitalist economy.
If Hollande's victory can inspire other countries to elect socialists,
then capitalism is in a precarious state.
We can hope for the best, but Hollande's victory does not let us off the hook from organizing our communities and changing ourselves.
If there is an imbalance of power in society, it is because there is an imbalance of power in politics
Friday, May 11, 2012
Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Sunday, May 6, 2012
Creating A Common Language For The 99%
I created this because I know that 99% of Americans lack the vocabulary necessary to engage in political discourse. This list obviously isn't comprehensive, but I'm OK with that. I hope that this post reaches someone who has the time to create a platform for occupiers to add definitions that are important to our struggle, so that the 99% can have a reliable resource to reference.
Anarchism: Anarchism is generally defined as the political philosophy which holds the state to be undesirable, unnecessary, and harmful,[1][2] or alternatively as opposing authority and hierarchical organization in the conduct of human relations.[3][4][5][6][7][8] Proponents of anarchism, known as "anarchists", advocate stateless societies based on non-hierarchical[3][9][10] voluntary associations.[11][12]
There are many types and traditions of anarchism, not all of which are mutually exclusive.
Anarchy: Anarchy (from the ancient Greek ἀναρχία, anarchia, meaning "absence of a leader"), has more than one definition. In the United States, the term "anarchy" typically is meant to refer to a society without a publicly enforced government or violently enforced political authority.[1][2] When used in this sense, anarchy may[3] or may not[4] be intended to imply political disorder or lawlessness within a society.
Outside of the US, and by most individuals that self-identify as anarchists, it implies a system of governance, mostly theoretical at a nation state level although there are a few successful historical examples,[5] that goes to lengths to avoid the use of coercion, violence, force and authority, while still producing a productive and desirable society.
Austerity: In economics, austerity is a policy of deficit-cutting, lower spending, and a reduction in the amount of benefits and public services provided.[1] Austerity policies are often used by governments to reduce their deficit spending[2] while sometimes coupled with increases in taxes to pay back creditors to reduce debt.
Capital: In economics, capital, capital goods, or real capital are those already-produced durable goods that are used in production of goods or services. The capital goods are not significantly consumed, though they may depreciate in the production process. Capital is distinct from land in that capital must itself be produced by human labor before it can be a factor of production. At any moment in time, total physical capital may be referred to as the capital stock (which is not to be confused with the capital stock of a business entity.) In a fundamental sense, capital consists of any produced thing that can enhance a person's power to perform economically useful work—a stone or an arrow is capital for a caveman who can use it as a hunting instrument, and roads are capital for inhabitants of a city. Capital is an input in the production function. Homes and personal autos are not capital but are instead durable goods because they are not used in a production effort.
In Marxian economics, capital is used to buy something only in order to sell it again to realize a financial profit, and for Marx capital only exists within the process of economic exchange—it is wealth that grows out of the process of circulation itself and forms the basis of the economic system of capitalism.
Capitalism: Capitalism is generally considered a philosophy of economic systems that favor private ownership of the means of production, creation of goods or services for profit or income by individuals or corporations, competitive markets, voluntary exchange, wage labor, capital accumulation, and personal finance.
Class: is a set of concepts in the social sciences and political theory centered on models of social stratification in which people are grouped into a set of hierarchical social categories. In common parlance, the term "social class," is usually synonymous with "socio-economic class," defined as: "people having the same social, economic, or educational status," e.g., "the working class"; "an emerging professional class."
Commune: is an intentional community of people living together, sharing common interests, property, possessions, resources, and, in some communes, work and income.
Communism (from Latin communis - common, universal) is a revolutionary socialist movement to create a classless, moneyless, and stateless social order structured upon common ownership of the means of production, as well as a social, political and economic ideology that aims at the establishment of this social order.
Cooperative: is an autonomous association of persons who voluntarily cooperate for their mutual social, economic, and cultural benefit.[1] Cooperatives include non-profit community organizations and businesses that are owned and managed by the people who use its services (a consumer cooperative) and/or by the people who work there (a worker cooperative).
Various aspects regarding cooperative enterprise are the focus of study in the field of cooperative economics.
Deregulation: is when government reduces its role and allows industry greater freedom in how it operates
Externality: In economics, an externality, or transaction spillover, is a cost or benefit that is not transmitted through prices[1] and is incurred by a party who did not agree to the action causing the cost or benefit.
Gender: is a range of characteristics used to distinguish between males and females, particularly in the cases of men and women and the masculine and feminine attributes that they possess. Depending on the context, the discriminating characteristics vary from sex to social role to gender identity.
International Monetary Fund: The International Monetary Fund (IMF) is an international organization that was created on July 22, 1944 at the Bretton Woods Conference and came into existence on December 27, 1945 when 29 countries signed the Articles of Agreement[1]. Countries contribute money to a pool through a quota system from which countries with payment imbalances can borrow funds on a temporary basis.
Marxism: Marxism is an economic and sociopolitical worldview and method of socioeconomic inquiry that centers upon a materialist interpretation of history, a dialectical view of social change, and an analysis and critique of the development of capitalism. Marxism was pioneered in the early to mid 19th century by two German philosophers, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Marxism encompasses Marxian economic theory, a sociological theory and a revolutionary view of social change that has influenced political movements around the world.[
Manufacturing Consent: Using the propaganda model, Manufacturing Consent posits that corporate-owned news mass communication media — print, radio, television — are businesses subject to commercial competition for advertising revenue and profit. As such, their distortion (editorial bias) of news reportage — i.e. what types of news, which items, and how they are reported — is a consequence of the profit motive that requires establishing a stable, profitable business; therefore, news businesses favoring profit over the public interest succeed, while those favoring reportorial accuracy over profits fail, and are relegated to the margins of their markets (low sales and ratings).
Means of Production: Means of production refers to physical, non-human inputs used in production—the factories, machines, and tools used to produce wealth[1] — along with both infrastructural capital and natural capital. This includes the classical factors of production minus financial capital and minus human capital. They include two broad categories of objects: instruments of labour (tools, factories, infrastructure, etc.) and subjects of labour (natural resources and raw materials). People operate on the subjects of labour, using the instruments of labour, to create a product; or, stated another way, labour acting on the means of production creates a product.[2] When used in the broad sense, the "means of production" includes the "means of distribution" which includes stores, banks, and railroads.
Nationalization: is the process of taking an industry or assets into government ownership by a national government or state.[1] Nationalization usually refers to private assets, but may also mean assets owned by lower levels of government, such as municipalities, being transferred to the public sector to be operated and owned by the state.
Neoliberalism: is a contemporary political movement advocating economic liberalizations, free trade and open markets. Neoliberalism supports the privatization of nationalized industries, deregulation, and enhancing the role of the private sector in modern society. It is commonly informed by neoclassical or Austrian economics. The central pillars of neoliberalism are the market and the individual.The central neoliberal goal is to 'roll back the frontiers of the state', in the belief that unregulated market capitalism will deliver efficiency, growth and widespread prosperity for all. In this view the 'dead hand' of the state saps initiative and discourages enterprise; government, however well-intentioned, invariably has a damaging effect upon human affairs. This is reflected in the liberal New Right's concern with the politics of ownership and its preference for private enterprise over nationalisation. Such ideas are associated with Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan. Thatcher viewed the 'nanny-state' as breeding a culture of dependency and undermining freedom - freedom that is understood as freedom of choice in the marketplace. [1] The term neoliberal today is often used as a general condemnation of economic liberalization policies and advocates.
Open Market: In a general sense used in economics and political economy, an open market refers to a market which is accessible to all economic actors. In an open market so defined, all economic actors have an equal opportunity of entry in that market. This contrasts with a protected market in which entry is conditional on certain financial and legal requirements or which is subject to tariff barriers, taxes, levies or state subsidies which effectively prevent some economic actors from participating in them (see [protectionism]).
Permaculture: is a branch of ecological design and ecological engineering, which develop sustainable human settlements and self-maintained agricultural systems modeled from natural ecosystems.[1][2]
The core values of permaculture are:
Production: In economics, production is the act of creating output, a good or service which has value and contributes to the utility of individuals.
Socialism
/ˈsoʊʃəlɪzəm/ is an economic system characterised by social ownership and/or control of the means of production and cooperative management of the economy,[1] and a political philosophy advocating such a system. "Social ownership" may refer to any one of, or a combination of, the following: cooperative enterprises, common ownership, direct public ownership or autonomous state enterprises.[2] There are many variations of socialism and as such there is no single definition encapsulating all of socialism.[3] They differ in the type of social ownership they advocate, the degree to which they rely on markets versus planning, how management is to be organised within economic enterprises, and the role of the state in constructing socialism.
Social Contract: or political contract is an intellectual construct that typically addresses two questions, first, that of the origin of society, and second, the question of the legitimacy of the authority of the state over the individual.[1] Social contract arguments typically posit that individuals have consented, either explicitly or tacitly, to surrender some of their freedoms and submit to the authority of the ruler or magistrate (or to the decision of a majority), in exchange for protection of their natural rights. The question of the relation between natural and legal rights, therefore, is often an aspect of social contract theory.
State: A state refers to a legal/political entity that is comprised of the following: a) a permanent population; b) a defined territory; c) a government ; and d) the capacity to enter into relations with other states.
Stock Market: or equity market is a public entity (a loose network of economic transactions, not a physical facility or discrete entity) for the trading of company stock (shares) and derivatives at an agreed price; these are securities listed on a stock exchange as well as those only traded privately.
World Bank: The World Bank is an international financial institution that provides loans[3] to developing countries for capital programs.
Anarchism: Anarchism is generally defined as the political philosophy which holds the state to be undesirable, unnecessary, and harmful,[1][2] or alternatively as opposing authority and hierarchical organization in the conduct of human relations.[3][4][5][6][7][8] Proponents of anarchism, known as "anarchists", advocate stateless societies based on non-hierarchical[3][9][10] voluntary associations.[11][12]
There are many types and traditions of anarchism, not all of which are mutually exclusive.
Anarchy: Anarchy (from the ancient Greek ἀναρχία, anarchia, meaning "absence of a leader"), has more than one definition. In the United States, the term "anarchy" typically is meant to refer to a society without a publicly enforced government or violently enforced political authority.[1][2] When used in this sense, anarchy may[3] or may not[4] be intended to imply political disorder or lawlessness within a society.
Outside of the US, and by most individuals that self-identify as anarchists, it implies a system of governance, mostly theoretical at a nation state level although there are a few successful historical examples,[5] that goes to lengths to avoid the use of coercion, violence, force and authority, while still producing a productive and desirable society.
Austerity: In economics, austerity is a policy of deficit-cutting, lower spending, and a reduction in the amount of benefits and public services provided.[1] Austerity policies are often used by governments to reduce their deficit spending[2] while sometimes coupled with increases in taxes to pay back creditors to reduce debt.
Capital: In economics, capital, capital goods, or real capital are those already-produced durable goods that are used in production of goods or services. The capital goods are not significantly consumed, though they may depreciate in the production process. Capital is distinct from land in that capital must itself be produced by human labor before it can be a factor of production. At any moment in time, total physical capital may be referred to as the capital stock (which is not to be confused with the capital stock of a business entity.) In a fundamental sense, capital consists of any produced thing that can enhance a person's power to perform economically useful work—a stone or an arrow is capital for a caveman who can use it as a hunting instrument, and roads are capital for inhabitants of a city. Capital is an input in the production function. Homes and personal autos are not capital but are instead durable goods because they are not used in a production effort.
In Marxian economics, capital is used to buy something only in order to sell it again to realize a financial profit, and for Marx capital only exists within the process of economic exchange—it is wealth that grows out of the process of circulation itself and forms the basis of the economic system of capitalism.
Capitalism: Capitalism is generally considered a philosophy of economic systems that favor private ownership of the means of production, creation of goods or services for profit or income by individuals or corporations, competitive markets, voluntary exchange, wage labor, capital accumulation, and personal finance.
Class: is a set of concepts in the social sciences and political theory centered on models of social stratification in which people are grouped into a set of hierarchical social categories. In common parlance, the term "social class," is usually synonymous with "socio-economic class," defined as: "people having the same social, economic, or educational status," e.g., "the working class"; "an emerging professional class."
Commune: is an intentional community of people living together, sharing common interests, property, possessions, resources, and, in some communes, work and income.
Communism (from Latin communis - common, universal) is a revolutionary socialist movement to create a classless, moneyless, and stateless social order structured upon common ownership of the means of production, as well as a social, political and economic ideology that aims at the establishment of this social order.
Cooperative: is an autonomous association of persons who voluntarily cooperate for their mutual social, economic, and cultural benefit.[1] Cooperatives include non-profit community organizations and businesses that are owned and managed by the people who use its services (a consumer cooperative) and/or by the people who work there (a worker cooperative).
Various aspects regarding cooperative enterprise are the focus of study in the field of cooperative economics.
Deregulation: is when government reduces its role and allows industry greater freedom in how it operates
Externality: In economics, an externality, or transaction spillover, is a cost or benefit that is not transmitted through prices[1] and is incurred by a party who did not agree to the action causing the cost or benefit.
Gender: is a range of characteristics used to distinguish between males and females, particularly in the cases of men and women and the masculine and feminine attributes that they possess. Depending on the context, the discriminating characteristics vary from sex to social role to gender identity.
International Monetary Fund: The International Monetary Fund (IMF) is an international organization that was created on July 22, 1944 at the Bretton Woods Conference and came into existence on December 27, 1945 when 29 countries signed the Articles of Agreement[1]. Countries contribute money to a pool through a quota system from which countries with payment imbalances can borrow funds on a temporary basis.
Marxism: Marxism is an economic and sociopolitical worldview and method of socioeconomic inquiry that centers upon a materialist interpretation of history, a dialectical view of social change, and an analysis and critique of the development of capitalism. Marxism was pioneered in the early to mid 19th century by two German philosophers, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Marxism encompasses Marxian economic theory, a sociological theory and a revolutionary view of social change that has influenced political movements around the world.[
Manufacturing Consent: Using the propaganda model, Manufacturing Consent posits that corporate-owned news mass communication media — print, radio, television — are businesses subject to commercial competition for advertising revenue and profit. As such, their distortion (editorial bias) of news reportage — i.e. what types of news, which items, and how they are reported — is a consequence of the profit motive that requires establishing a stable, profitable business; therefore, news businesses favoring profit over the public interest succeed, while those favoring reportorial accuracy over profits fail, and are relegated to the margins of their markets (low sales and ratings).
Means of Production: Means of production refers to physical, non-human inputs used in production—the factories, machines, and tools used to produce wealth[1] — along with both infrastructural capital and natural capital. This includes the classical factors of production minus financial capital and minus human capital. They include two broad categories of objects: instruments of labour (tools, factories, infrastructure, etc.) and subjects of labour (natural resources and raw materials). People operate on the subjects of labour, using the instruments of labour, to create a product; or, stated another way, labour acting on the means of production creates a product.[2] When used in the broad sense, the "means of production" includes the "means of distribution" which includes stores, banks, and railroads.
Nationalization: is the process of taking an industry or assets into government ownership by a national government or state.[1] Nationalization usually refers to private assets, but may also mean assets owned by lower levels of government, such as municipalities, being transferred to the public sector to be operated and owned by the state.
Neoliberalism: is a contemporary political movement advocating economic liberalizations, free trade and open markets. Neoliberalism supports the privatization of nationalized industries, deregulation, and enhancing the role of the private sector in modern society. It is commonly informed by neoclassical or Austrian economics. The central pillars of neoliberalism are the market and the individual.The central neoliberal goal is to 'roll back the frontiers of the state', in the belief that unregulated market capitalism will deliver efficiency, growth and widespread prosperity for all. In this view the 'dead hand' of the state saps initiative and discourages enterprise; government, however well-intentioned, invariably has a damaging effect upon human affairs. This is reflected in the liberal New Right's concern with the politics of ownership and its preference for private enterprise over nationalisation. Such ideas are associated with Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan. Thatcher viewed the 'nanny-state' as breeding a culture of dependency and undermining freedom - freedom that is understood as freedom of choice in the marketplace. [1] The term neoliberal today is often used as a general condemnation of economic liberalization policies and advocates.
Open Market: In a general sense used in economics and political economy, an open market refers to a market which is accessible to all economic actors. In an open market so defined, all economic actors have an equal opportunity of entry in that market. This contrasts with a protected market in which entry is conditional on certain financial and legal requirements or which is subject to tariff barriers, taxes, levies or state subsidies which effectively prevent some economic actors from participating in them (see [protectionism]).
Permaculture: is a branch of ecological design and ecological engineering, which develop sustainable human settlements and self-maintained agricultural systems modeled from natural ecosystems.[1][2]
The core values of permaculture are:
- Care of the Earth: Provision for all life systems to continue and multiply.
- Care of People: Provision for people to access those resources necessary for their existence
- Setting Limits to Population and Consumption: By governing our own needs, we can set resources aside to further the above principles.[3][4]
Production: In economics, production is the act of creating output, a good or service which has value and contributes to the utility of individuals.
Socialism
Social Contract: or political contract is an intellectual construct that typically addresses two questions, first, that of the origin of society, and second, the question of the legitimacy of the authority of the state over the individual.[1] Social contract arguments typically posit that individuals have consented, either explicitly or tacitly, to surrender some of their freedoms and submit to the authority of the ruler or magistrate (or to the decision of a majority), in exchange for protection of their natural rights. The question of the relation between natural and legal rights, therefore, is often an aspect of social contract theory.
State: A state refers to a legal/political entity that is comprised of the following: a) a permanent population; b) a defined territory; c) a government ; and d) the capacity to enter into relations with other states.
Stock Market: or equity market is a public entity (a loose network of economic transactions, not a physical facility or discrete entity) for the trading of company stock (shares) and derivatives at an agreed price; these are securities listed on a stock exchange as well as those only traded privately.
World Bank: The World Bank is an international financial institution that provides loans[3] to developing countries for capital programs.
Thursday, May 3, 2012
Meet The 1%
1. Bill gates $61 Billion, 56, Microsoft.
2. Warren Buffett, $44 Billion, 81, Berkshire Hathaway.
3. Larry Ellison $36 Billion, 67, Oracle.
4. Christy Walton & Family $25.3 Billion, 57, Wal-Mart.
5. Charles Koch, $25 Billion, 76, Diversified.
6. David Koch, $25 Billion, 71, Diversified.
7. Sheldon Adelson, $24.9 Billion, 78, Casinos.
8. Jim Walton, $23.7 Billion, 64, Wal-Mart.
9. Alice Walton, $23 Billion, 62, Wal-Mart.
10. S.Robson Walton, $23.1 Billion, 68, Wal-Mart.
11. Michael Bloomberg, $22.3 Billion, 70, Bloomberg LP.
12. George Soros, $20 Billion, 81 Hedge Funds.
13. Sergey Brin $18.7 Billion. 38, Google.
14. Larry Page $18.7 Billion, 39, Google.
15. Jeff Bezos, $18.4 Billion, 48, Amazon.com.
16. Mark Zuckerberg, $17.5 Billion, 27, Facebook.
17. Michael Dell, $15.9 Billion, 47, Dell.
18. Steve Ballmer, $15.7 Billion, 56, Microsoft.
19. Phil Knight, $14.4 Billion, 74, Nike.
20. Paul Allen, $14.2 Billion, 58, Microsoft, Investments.
21. Carl Icahn, $14 Billion, 76, Leveraged buyouts.
22. Forrest Mars Jr, $13.8 Billion, 80 Candy.
23. Jacqueline Mars $13.8 B, 72 Candy.
24. John Mars $13.8B, 75 Candy.
25. Anne Cox Chambers, $12.5 Billion, 92, media.
26. John Paulson, $12.5 Billion, 56, hedge funds.
27. Donald Bren, $12 Billion, 79, real estate.
28. Ronald Perelman, $12 Billion, 69, Leveraged buyouts.
29. Len Blavatnik, $11.9 Billion, 54, diversified.
30. Harold Hamm, $11 Billion, 66, Oil & Gas.
31. James simsons, $10.7 Billion, 73, Hedge Funds.
32. Jack Taylor & Family, $10.4 Billion, 89 Enterprise Rent-A-Car.
33. Ray Dalio, $10 Billion, 62, Hedge Funds.
34. George Kaiser, $10 Billion, 69, oil & gas, banking.
35. Laurene Powell Jobs & Family, $9 Billion, 48, Apple, Disney.
$637.5 Billion
$637,500,000,000
We aren't going to attack the 1%, we are attacking an environment that allows a 1% to exist.
1. For profit banks / For profit investments -- (which disregard ethics)
2. Poor education system
3. News as entertainment
4. An environmentally destructive economy
5. Private ownership of the means of production
We seek a system that puts the society above the individual.
2. Warren Buffett, $44 Billion, 81, Berkshire Hathaway.
3. Larry Ellison $36 Billion, 67, Oracle.
4. Christy Walton & Family $25.3 Billion, 57, Wal-Mart.
5. Charles Koch, $25 Billion, 76, Diversified.
6. David Koch, $25 Billion, 71, Diversified.
7. Sheldon Adelson, $24.9 Billion, 78, Casinos.
8. Jim Walton, $23.7 Billion, 64, Wal-Mart.
9. Alice Walton, $23 Billion, 62, Wal-Mart.
10. S.Robson Walton, $23.1 Billion, 68, Wal-Mart.
11. Michael Bloomberg, $22.3 Billion, 70, Bloomberg LP.
12. George Soros, $20 Billion, 81 Hedge Funds.
13. Sergey Brin $18.7 Billion. 38, Google.
14. Larry Page $18.7 Billion, 39, Google.
15. Jeff Bezos, $18.4 Billion, 48, Amazon.com.
16. Mark Zuckerberg, $17.5 Billion, 27, Facebook.
17. Michael Dell, $15.9 Billion, 47, Dell.
18. Steve Ballmer, $15.7 Billion, 56, Microsoft.
19. Phil Knight, $14.4 Billion, 74, Nike.
20. Paul Allen, $14.2 Billion, 58, Microsoft, Investments.
21. Carl Icahn, $14 Billion, 76, Leveraged buyouts.
22. Forrest Mars Jr, $13.8 Billion, 80 Candy.
23. Jacqueline Mars $13.8 B, 72 Candy.
24. John Mars $13.8B, 75 Candy.
25. Anne Cox Chambers, $12.5 Billion, 92, media.
26. John Paulson, $12.5 Billion, 56, hedge funds.
27. Donald Bren, $12 Billion, 79, real estate.
28. Ronald Perelman, $12 Billion, 69, Leveraged buyouts.
29. Len Blavatnik, $11.9 Billion, 54, diversified.
30. Harold Hamm, $11 Billion, 66, Oil & Gas.
31. James simsons, $10.7 Billion, 73, Hedge Funds.
32. Jack Taylor & Family, $10.4 Billion, 89 Enterprise Rent-A-Car.
33. Ray Dalio, $10 Billion, 62, Hedge Funds.
34. George Kaiser, $10 Billion, 69, oil & gas, banking.
35. Laurene Powell Jobs & Family, $9 Billion, 48, Apple, Disney.
$637.5 Billion
$637,500,000,000
We aren't going to attack the 1%, we are attacking an environment that allows a 1% to exist.
1. For profit banks / For profit investments -- (which disregard ethics)
2. Poor education system
3. News as entertainment
4. An environmentally destructive economy
5. Private ownership of the means of production
We seek a system that puts the society above the individual.
Wednesday, May 2, 2012
May Day #M1GS #OWS
What does the public do when Occupiers do something that gets their attention?
1. The public is informed by a news provider whose political orientation frames the issue
2. The
public processes information in a conventional and non-contextual
way
3. The
public typically fails to understand events from the left's perspective
What
do Occupiers do when the public reacts to something they did?
1. Occupiers process the publics' reactions to an event
2.
Occupiers take a stance on the event -- often shaped by the public's reaction
3.
Occupy either becomes stronger or weaker / united or divided
Friday, April 20, 2012
"It's The Economy"
I recently spoke with a close friend who I've known since high school. As we were catching up he told me finding a job hasn't been the easiest thing to do. I could relate to the difficulties that he has experienced. For example, the types of jobs he is looking for aren't available, and his resume isn't the most eye-catching either (I suffer from both of these). He then mentioned to me that his mom made, or makes, a comment about how easy it was for her to find a job when she was his age, and that she thinks it's easy to find a job. And then he said the thing that caught my attention. He said something along the lines of "she doesn't understand, we have a terrible economy, there aren't jobs available." I gave him a terrible response like "furreal," and then began pondering something. It seems that everyone I know attributes their economic situation to the economic recession. While I am aware that the economic recession has had a devastating impact on people all around the world, no one, especially the media, is blaming other aspects that shape their pitiful economic situation. There's not much being said about race and unemployment, gender and unemployment, class and unemployment, the private ownership of the means of production, stock holders, racist/classist social policy, geography, etc.
Perhaps it is worthwhile to mention that this reflects how economists/politicians evaluate the economy/society, that is, through indicators that do not reflect just or unjust economies or healthy societies. The absence of intersectionality in the conversation about the economic condition of individuals and society supports the claim that politics is not about the well being of society, but about the well being of institutions like the economy.
Sunday, April 8, 2012
Considering Commodification
About a year ago I worked on a research project for my qualitative research methods class where I spent time with members of the electro dance music scene. When I started the project I had no idea what it meant and what it still means to be a raver or even what a 'real rave' was. After about a month of spending time in the scene I started to believe that the venue, people, and scene I was studying were not the things I thought they were. I entered the project with the understanding that I was studying ravers; it wasn't until I spent some time studying and observing the subjects did I realize that I was studying the product of a commodified subculture. The venue wasn't an authentic venue for 'real raves,' instead of a warehouse the events I attended were hosted in clubs. Instead of cultural beliefs like PLUR (peace, love, unity, and respect) constituting the collective conscious, drugs, sexual activity, etc. were. And instead of collective self-organization playing a role in the events, business owners were planning and throwing the events. Despite the fact that raves lost many of their core qualities, electro music was never able to be kicked out of the culture.
This is the role of commodification; to turn something, a service or item, into something that can be sold -- but more importantly, sold to the masses. Throughout history we have seen the commodification of products, services, and subcultures (punk culture), destroy the things we loved and needed. This was my reaction when I realized the rave scene had been commodified, packaged, and sold to the masses. But what I have recently realized is that by commodifying raves, electronic music -- one of the pillars of the rave scene, electronic music was able to enter the mainstream -- something that I assume the first DJs thought never could happen. Even though raves have been commodified for the masses, 'real raves' still exist and are being sought out by individuals who were reeled in by commodified raves.
Drawing from this example and the idea that commodification is the act of turning a product or service into something that can be sold to the masses, I feel that political subcultures can gain political power by commodifying their ideas for the masses.
This is the role of commodification; to turn something, a service or item, into something that can be sold -- but more importantly, sold to the masses. Throughout history we have seen the commodification of products, services, and subcultures (punk culture), destroy the things we loved and needed. This was my reaction when I realized the rave scene had been commodified, packaged, and sold to the masses. But what I have recently realized is that by commodifying raves, electronic music -- one of the pillars of the rave scene, electronic music was able to enter the mainstream -- something that I assume the first DJs thought never could happen. Even though raves have been commodified for the masses, 'real raves' still exist and are being sought out by individuals who were reeled in by commodified raves.
Drawing from this example and the idea that commodification is the act of turning a product or service into something that can be sold to the masses, I feel that political subcultures can gain political power by commodifying their ideas for the masses.
COMODDIFY YOUR POLITICAL SUBCULTURE!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
